Charlotte is in the early stages of working toward a new data center policy amid a development moratorium, part of a growing wave of project pauses happening in jurisdictions around the country.

Since its 150-day moratorium began in June, city staff has been doing research, engaging with stakeholders and working to create policy recommendations, Charlotte officials told Bisnow. Part of that research involves looking at how other cities and counties have utilized moratoriums in recent months, City Council Member Ed Driggs said.

The steps the city takes during its moratorium are representative of how more than 100 local governments across the U.S. are grappling with an issue that has sparked escalating backlash, driven by data centers’ massive demand for water and power. The outcome of Charlotte’s moratorium could determine whether major developers like American Tower Corp. can proceed with their projects.

“We are experiencing in Charlotte the same sort of controversy you’re seeing elsewhere in the country, over their impacts and lack of regulation,” Driggs said in an interview.  

Charlotte approved its moratorium following months of heated debate over the build-out of data centers in the city, largely sparked by American Tower’s controversial proposed project that would sit on 58 acres near Reedy Creek Nature Preserve. 

The city hasn’t approved American Tower’s rezoning request to build its data center, and a hearing for the project was delayed from June until at least November. American Tower declined to comment for this story. 

The 150-day pause is slated to end in November, but Driggs said there is a chance it could get extended.

“There’s a possibility, depending on what work gets done during the 150 days, that the moratorium could be longer,” he said.

Charlotte is a hot spot for data center development, housing roughly 40 operating facilities, according to Data Center Map. North Carolina is home to 95 active data centers.

Several cities in North Carolina have approved moratoriums as the issue reaches the state level nationwide. Earlier this month, nearby Davie County passed its own one-year data center moratorium. New York became the first state to impose a yearlong ban on data center construction as a handful of other states consider similar measures.

While supporters of data centers say the facilities will stimulate the economy and generate tax revenue, opponents cite concerns over environmental impacts — especially as North Carolina grapples with a drought — and a potential spike in power costs for consumers. 

Duke Energy said in the spring that 6 gigawatts of data center demand was in its development pipeline in the Carolinas, an amount that could power roughly between 3 million and 6 million homes. Duke last month proposed an 18% electric rate increase for households, but it cut that request to around 9.5%, Axios reported this week.  

Newly sworn-in Mayor Rob Harrington told Bisnow in an email that the moratorium in Charlotte “allows staff the necessary time to consider questions before any additional development moves forward.” He said he looks forward to reviewing the feedback to find the best path forward. 

The site near 8036 Hood Road in Charlotte where American Tower Corp. has proposed a data center

As the moratorium continues, data center projects that were in development before the pause was approved can continue construction. 

Data center projects in Charlotte include PowerHouse Data Centers’ plans for a 122-acre campus off of University City Boulevard and Digital Realty’s plans for a 12 megawatt, four-story data center at 725 E. Trade St. Spokespeople for the two companies didn’t respond to requests for comment on the status of their projects.

On Aug. 20, the city council is slated to hold a town hall on the moratorium, according to the Charlotte Business Journal.

At the end of the moratorium, Charlotte city staff is expected to present its findings to the council, and members will then hold discussions and gauge community input before deciding on policy changes, Driggs said.  

“We found that we could establish this 150-day pause while we look at our policies and consider whether, in light of the rise of AI and the growth and demand for data centers, a more differentiated policy is called for,” he said.

If it extends the moratorium to a one-year period, Driggs said Charlotte could better prepare itself for a future of data center development.

PPR Capital Management just began investing in the build-to-rent housing sector last year, and now it is looking to pounce on a market it sees as benefiting from the new federal housing law. 

The Wayne, Pennsylvania-based firm this week is launching the PPR Keystone Housing Growth Fund, its first-ever fund focused on build-to-rent housing. PPR executives tell Bisnow it has a fundraising target of $100M. 

Courtesy of PPR Capital Management

A build-to-rent property PPR acquired in the Nashville metro area

The fund is designed to buy build-to-rent communities from the developers that constructed them. This type of sale was ultimately allowed by the 21st Century Road to Housing Act after months of debate over a proposal that would have required these types of homes be sold to individual buyers. 

The lengthy period of uncertainty froze the BTR market and caused financial distress that PPR is looking to capitalize on.

“There’s a lot of product available across the markets we’re targeting that has been built to rent but that the builder, their original take-out isn’t there anymore,” PPR Chief Asset Officer Craig Johnsen said. “So we are targeting build-to-rent properties, but also taking the development risk out of there and buying from distressed sellers.”

He named 10 regions the firm is targeting: Dallas, Salt Lake City, Nashville, Charlotte, Philadelphia, Chicago, Raleigh, Denver, West Palm Beach and Richmond. 

The fund is raising money from accredited individual investors, and its minimum check size is $50K. It is looking to buy properties with between 150 and 250 units, and with its $100M fundraising target, Johnsen said he anticipates that would yield six to eight deals. 

Founded in 2007, PPR is a private equity firm with $1.5B in assets under management. It has historically focused on acquiring nonperforming loans and residential mortgages. The firm began buying some multifamily in 2022 before entering the BTR sector last year. 

Johnsen said there were distressed BTR situations popping up early last year even before Congress disrupted the market. An overbuilding of units in some markets made it impossible for some developers to achieve the rents they needed to hit their return projections. 

An estimated 68,000 build-to-rent housing units began construction in the U.S. last year, according to the National Association of Home Builders, below the 2024 peak of 84,000 units but above most other years this century. 

BTR housing starts soared after the pandemic and became a larger share of the single-family housing market.

Some developers that have been unable to hit their rent projections have decided to cut their losses and sell, Johnsen said. 

This was the case for the first BTR deal PPR closed in March 2025: the $87M purchase of the Highline at Knoxville in Tennessee.  

“That happened to be one where the first phase of construction was totally complete and the second phase was underway, and they were looking to get out of the deal — they could see how the economics were going,” Johnsen said. 

While these conditions existed early last year, the lengthy Road to Housing debate made it much more difficult for BTR developers to sell their assets, as prospective buyers didn’t know how the rules for the market would be rewritten. 

Now that the bill became law Saturday at midnight — without President Donald Trump’s signature — the market appears ripe for a rebound. Hunter Housing Economics President Brad Hunter told Bisnow this week that BTR “could absolutely be one of the biggest winners” of the legislation.

Johnsen described the BTR market as being “over the hurdle.”

“We’re not anticipating any additional headwinds from a regulatory standpoint for build-to-rent going forward,” he said. “So that makes it a great time, especially given one reason a building might be under distress or needs capital to take them out was because of this three- to six-month period where there was a pause.”

Much of the debate over the bill had centered on lawmakers’ concerns about large companies buying up single-family houses and pricing individuals out of the market. The law ultimately kept some restrictions for institutional investors buying single-family homes, but it included a carve-out for build-to-rent properties. 

Developers that built single-family home projects intentionally for renters did so with the plan of ultimately selling to another landlord, rather than individuals, so Johnsen said the economics wouldn’t work for them to sell homes one by one.

And he said these properties don’t present an attractive investment for homebuyers compared to renting, given the elevated interest rates and homeownership costs like association fees and maintenance. 

“The levered return on buying a townhome for a homeowner is not actually good anymore,” he said. “When I look at it in terms of PPR wanting to supply housing to people, it’s more cost-effective for a company like ourselves to experience economies of scale.”

While PPR isn’t building new housing with this fund, Johnsen said allowing developers to exit their prior projects frees them up to build more.

More build-to-rent housing is needed across the country because Americans are increasingly renting for longer periods of their lives, but some still want the comfort of a single-family home with a yard. 

This creates strong demand for BTR housing, and Johnsen said he doesn’t see that changing anytime soon. He said that is part of why PPR decided to focus on BTR with its new fund.

“Going forward, rents in build-to-rent properties — or properties that mimic single-family housing, whether it’s a townhome or detached single-family — are going to significantly outperform rents at your more traditional garden-style, podium-style multifamily property,” he said. 

“But right now, especially given some of the supply surges that have happened in these Sun Belt markets, that’s not really reflected in their valuations,” he added. “So we think there’s a great opportunity for our investors to get in with relatively low downside.”

It’s not just New York and California — the office market is getting healthier across the country.

Bisnow/created with ChatGPT

National office vacancy rates declined 10 basis points in the second quarter, with more than half of the 92 markets tracked by Cushman & Wakefield notching a dip in vacancy rates. The second-quarter results reinforced an uptick at the start of the year that has been building despite macroeconomic volatility. 

Vacancy has declined for two consecutive quarters as tenants fill the highest-quality buildings, leading some demand to trickle into the Class-A tier as the worst office space is being taken out of commission, with more than 90,000 apartments in the office-to-residential conversion pipeline. 

“The first half of 2026 reinforced that the office recovery is no longer confined to a handful of leading markets or trophy assets,” David Smith, the head of Americas insights at Cushman & Wakefield, said in a statement. 

Vacancy declined in 49 of the 92 markets tracked by Cushman, or 53% of cities. Tech firms building artificial intelligence tools continue to drive leasing activity, and the best-performing markets continue to be tech-centric hubs. San Francisco, Orange County and Midtown Manhattan recorded the largest year-over-year declines in vacancy, according to Cushman.

Other areas around New York City are well represented in the top 20 markets for vacancy declines, joined by secondary markets including Kansas City, Missouri; Charlotte; Jacksonville, Florida; Austin; and others. Many of the markets are bouncing back from cyclical vacancy highs, with San Francisco gaining 364 basis points of occupancy but leaving overall vacancy elevated at 30%. 

The wide representation of markets seeing vacancy dips suggests that office leasing activity is more broad-based and not solely reliant with tech tenants.

Total U.S. office inventory also contracted by 33M SF over the past five quarters, and 20 markets have had at least 1% of their office space taken off the market, as more conversions are proposed. 

Among markets moving in the other direction, vacancy climbed the most year-over-year in Cleveland, although the city’s vacancy rate is below the national average of 20.1%.

Boston, Oklahoma City, Puget Sound’s Eastside outside Seattle and Los Angeles’ central business district round out the five markets where vacancy has grown the most year-over-year. Boston’s vacancy rate is still below the national average, and neighborhoods outside Downtown Los Angeles have seen vacancy plateau over the last three quarters.

Tenants vacated a net 300K SF of space during the second quarter, but absorption for the rolling 12 quarters totaled 14.3M SF after revisions to previous quarters’ totals pushed move-ins higher and suggest that this quarter’s total could also shift upward.

Sublease availability has also declined 15% year-over-year to 96M SF, its lowest point since early 2021, and continuing a downward trend that Cushman says historically precedes a broader market recovery. 

More conversions will be announced, helping support gradual occupancy improvement across the sector as it benefits from healthier supply-side dynamics, Smith said. 

New York-based DLC Management Corp. has acquired an open-air shopping center in Charlotte’s Northlake neighborhood.

The center, Perimeter Woods, sits at 10125 Perimeter Parkway, across from Northlake Mall, and is accessible via Interstates 485 and 77, the Charlotte Business Journal reported. The 127K SF retail center is anchored by Best Buy, PetSmart, Burlington and Michael’s. The property spans more than 20 acres along the parkway.

The $36.6M deal for the site was part of a six-property acquisition by DLC, which specializes in open-air shopping center development. DLC owns and operates nearly 100 centers in the U.S., including the 303K SF Pavilion at King’s Grant in Concord, north of Charlotte. The six-property deal adds more than 1M SF to the firm’s portfolio across several states, according to the CBJ.

The Perimeter Woods acquisition reflects continued investor interest in Charlotte’s retail market, despite the challenges the 1.1M SF Northlake Mall across the street has faced. The enclosed mall sold last year for about $39M following a period of financial distress. 

Open-air shopping centers tend to be more reliable assets than enclosed malls, as their mainstream retail anchors, like grocery markets or big-box stores, provide stable shopping traffic, according to investment firm RockStep Capital. Enclosed malls include a variety of tenants to manage, from entertainment to dining to fitness, and often require longer lease terms. Open-air centers usually have lower operating costs, better visibility and accessibility, and are more sustainable than indoor malls, according to a McNeil Engineering report.

In recent years, many retailers have shifted from malls toward “outdoor, non-mall locations such as grocery-anchored shopping centers and strip malls,” The Wall Street Journal reported in 2024.

Among three different mall formats — indoor malls, open-air shopping centers and outlet malls — open-air shopping centers saw the most traffic growth year-over-year, according to the April Placer.ai mall index. Those centers’ visits rose 3.5% in April compared to the previous year, while indoor malls saw a 2.2% increase.

Retail vacancy in Charlotte is among the lowest in the U.S., at less than 2.9%, according to a first-quarter Colliers report. The rate has stayed below 3% for three consecutive years.  

Charlotte has a few more enclosed malls in addition to Northlake, including SouthPark Mall, Concord Mills and Carolina Place Mall. But the metro has many more open-air shopping sites — at least 15 open-air malls, like Phillips Place — as well as walkable shopping-oriented villages.

DLC made the acquisition with a fund managed by investment adviser DRA Advisors, the CBJ reported. The seller was KRG Charlotte Perimeter Woods LLC, affiliated with Kite Realty Group. 

Opposition to data center development has intensified across the U.S.

A fast-growing number of states and local governments have passed or are debating moratoriums on new data center construction. This wave of data center bans spreading across the country threatens to further impede an industry already struggling to secure enough land and power to meet surging demand. 

Bisnow/Jon Banister

Virginia data center opponents protest outside an industry event in 2023.

Data centers have emerged as a major policy concern at the state, local and federal levels. Large-scale projects routinely face heated community opposition due to resident fears about environmental impacts and local quality of life, while broader concerns about these facilities’ massive power consumption generate national headlines. 

These concerns, combined with anxiety about the consequences of the artificial intelligence technologies they enable, have led data centers to become deeply unpopular. Opposition to data centers is proving to be a fruitful position for politicians across the political spectrum and at every level of government.

Over the past three years, efforts to manage or restrict data center development in the industry’s major hubs have risen steadily, but in recent months, many efforts have emerged to impose moratoriums that would pause data center development altogether. These initiatives are gaining traction in hyperscale development hotbeds and locations that draw little interest from data center builders. 

In Congress, Democratic lawmakers Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unveiled a data center moratorium bill in March. While it faces long odds of becoming law, similar bills at the state level are inching closer to becoming reality. 

Since the start of this year, 14 different states have considered moratoriums on new data center construction. This month, the New York Legislature passed a bill pausing all new data center development for a year. Should Gov. Kathy Hochul sign it into law, New York will become the first state to have a data center moratorium go into effect. 

New York’s potential moratorium comes on the heels of the Maine Legislature passing a similar data center pause, which was vetoed by Gov. Janet Mills in April.

Most state-level moratorium bills propose pausing data center construction for between one and three years while studies are conducted on the facilities’ environmental and economic impacts. Some outliers, like Vermont, have proposed longer bans. The bills generally focus only on pausing the construction of new data centers, although a Wisconsin bill would also halt ongoing operations at existing data centers.

Meanwhile, dozens of county and municipal governments across the U.S. have been passing their own data center bans. Some of these moratoriums have come in areas inundated by large-scale data center projects, like DeKalb County, Georgia, or communities where a proposed data center project proved deeply unpopular, such as in Normal, Illinois. Some towns, like Mansfield, Massachusetts, have passed bans despite drawing no interest from data center developers. 

For many in the data center sector, the political peril facing the industry presents the greatest challenge constraining its growth. Companies are bracing for the possibility that an industry already strapped for developable land may soon find that its options are even more limited.

Below is a list of state and local data center moratoriums that have been proposed this year.

State Moratoriums

New York

Earlier this month, the New York Legislature passed a one-year moratorium on siting, construction or commencement of operations of data centers 20 megawatts and larger. The bill requires the governor’s signature to become law, and it remains unclear whether she plans to sign or veto it.

The bill initially called for a three-year moratorium on new data center development before being amended to just one. It also requires the state’s Public Service Commission to draft new rules regulating data center power consumption. And it mandates an extensive environmental impact report from the Department of Environmental Conservation that would include regulatory and legislative policy recommendations and measure the water and power consumption of data centers already operating in the state. 

Maine

In April, Maine became the first state to have a data center moratorium pass its legislature, with lawmakers approving a bill pausing the development of new data centers in the state larger than 20 MW until November 2027. The governor then vetoed the bill.

Still, a similar bill could be coming in the near future. Despite her veto, Mills has said she supports a temporary pause on new data center construction and would have signed the bill if it had included an exemption for a specific data center project already underway in the state. 

Virginia

A torrent of data center legislation has advanced in the industry’s largest hub, with more than 60 bills introduced in the most recent legislative session aiming to manage its growth across the commonwealth. One of these bills — introduced by Del. Irene Shin, a Democrat representing Fairfax County — aims to implement a moratorium on all new data centers 1 MW or larger. This pause would last until July 2028 or until all data center grid interconnection requests are fulfilled. The bill remains in committee and was pushed into the next legislative session. 

Maryland

In January, Del. Mark Fisher, a Republican, introduced an emergency bill into the Maryland House of Delegates imposing a ban on data center construction and planning of data centers 100 MW and larger. The bill is in committee. 

Vermont

A bill introduced in January by a group of lawmakers in the Vermont General Assembly aims to implement a moratorium on the siting and construction of new data centers until 2030. During that time, the bill requires the state’s Public Utility Commission to report on how data centers impact Vermont’s natural resources and economy. The bill remains in committee. 

Oklahoma

Oklahoma lawmakers are considering a bill from Republican Sen. Kendal Sacchieri to create a moratorium on data center construction until November 2029. Applying to data centers 100 MW and larger, the pause is intended to give the Oklahoma Corporation Commission time to conduct an impact study. The bill is in committee. 

Michigan

Multiple lawmakers in Michigan have introduced bills that would enact a statewide data center moratorium, preventing local governments and the state’s Public Service Commission from approving these facilities to give officials time to evaluate their impact. The moratorium would last until at least April 2027. While these bills remain in committee, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, has been supportive of data center development in the state. 

Minnesota

Introduced by Senate Democrats in March, a Minnesota bill would require the state’s Public Utilities Commission to submit a comprehensive report on the impact of data centers by July 2027 and would ban the construction of new data centers larger than 100 MW until a year after the report’s publication. The bill remains in committee. 

South Carolina

A pair of joint resolutions filed by South Carolina lawmakers in April would prevent local and state government agencies from issuing approvals related to data centers until 2028. The bills would also enact a moratorium on applications for new data centers larger than 5 MW until the state government establishes a comprehensive oversight framework. The bills remain in committee. 

Pennsylvania

A bill introduced this month in the Pennsylvania Senate by Democrat Katie Muth would ban the construction of “high impact” data centers 25 MW and larger for three years. The bill, now in committee, also mandates new studies on the impact of these facilities and authorizes local governments to enact their own data center bans. 

Georgia

Georgia lawmakers are considering a bill that would ban data center construction for a year starting in July. Introduced by Democrat Jaha Howard, the bill remains in committee. A similar bill introduced in the Georgia House of Representatives would pause data center construction until 2029 while the state conducts an impact study. 

New Hampshire

Legislation in New Hampshire calling for a one-year moratorium on data center construction was killed in committee in March.

Wisconsin

A bill introduced in Wisconsin would have been among the most restrictive moratoriums under consideration, applying not just to new construction but also to the operation of existing data centers larger than 100 MW. However, the bill was killed in committee in March. 

South Dakota

A House bill in South Dakota would have temporarily banned the construction or expansion of data centers over 50 MW until July 2027. The bill didn’t advance through committee. 

Local Moratoriums

According to datacenterbans.com and local news outlets, more than 100 cities, towns and counties have also proposed or passed data center moratoriums. 

Alabama

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Georgia

• DeKalb County
• Camden County
• Pike County
• Lamar County
• Troup County
• LaGrange
• Clayton County
• Athens-Clarke County
• Monroe County
• Lee County

Illinois

Indiana

• Fulton County
• Starke County
• Dearborn County
• White County
• Putnam County
• Pulaski County
• Indianapolis (proposed)

Iowa

• Dubuque County
• Johnson County
• Clarke County
• Adair County
• Shelby County

Kansas

• Sedgwick County
• Miami County (proposed)
• Harvey County

Kentucky

• Oldham County
• Scott County
• Meade County
• Ashland

Louisiana

Maine

• Bangor
• Wiscasset
• Lewiston
• Scarborough (proposed)

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Michigan is the most active state for data center moratoriums, with close to 50 counties enacting or considering such bans. The total area in which data center construction is at least temporarily prohibited is roughly the size of Rhode Island.

• Meridian Township 
• Northville
• Soringfield
• Pontiac
• Sterling Heights
• Detroit (proposed)
• Ypsilanti Township
• City of Ypsilanti
• East Lansing
• Howell
• Mason 
• Armada
• Dundee
• Grand Blanc
• Green Charter
• Hayes
• Lenox
• Lodi
• Manchester
• Pittsfield
• Saginaw
• Saline
• South Lyon
• Sylvan
• Taylor
• Tyrone
• Ann Arbor
• Erie
• Delta County (proposed)
• Washington

Minnesota

Missouri

• St. Charles
• Jackson County (proposed)
• Columbia

Nevada

New Jersey

• Princeton Township
• Phillipsburg

New York

North Carolina

• Charlotte
• Chatham County
• Orange County
• Canton
• Boone
• Gates County
• Brevard
• Clay County
• Kings Mountain
• Apex
• Swain County
• Rowan County
• Boiling Spring Lakes
• Hillsborough

North Dakota

• Morton County
• Mercer County
• Dunn County

Ohio

• Jerome
• Lordstown
• Muhlenberg
• Massillon
• Plain
• Vienna
• Washington
• Ashville
• South Bloomfield
• Ironton (proposed)
• Yellow Springs (proposed)

Oklahoma

Rhode Island

Tennessee

• Nashville (proposed)
• Washington County

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

Wisconsin

• Port Washington
• Madison
• Manitowoc County
• Cassville Township
• Waterloo Township

Austin is leading all U.S. cities in office-using employment growth, even though its office vacancy rate remains well above the national average.

The Sun Belt filled the top five spots in office-use employment, which included Raleigh, North Carolina, Nashville, Dallas and Charlotte, according to a recent Avison Young report. Between 2019 and 2025, Austin’s office-using employment grew by roughly 34%. Raleigh saw the second-highest growth at approximately 23%. 

Avison Young attributed the trend to healthier demand and elevated leasing activity.

But despite job growth, Austin posted a 22.4% office vacancy rate in the first quarter, according to Colliers. This rate has remained flat year-over-year, with Q1 2025 reporting a 22.5% vacancy rate. The national average was 18.6% during the first quarter of 2026, CBRE reported.

However, there is hope on the horizon. With Austin leading the nation in office-use growth, the metro area’s vacancy rate is likely to gradually decline, Avison Young’s Regional Manager of Market Intelligence Ariel Guerrero told Bisnow. 

“With Austin’s office development pipeline now slowing significantly and the metro still leading the nation in office-using job growth, vacancy has likely peaked and should gradually trend downward over the next year,” he said.

Since 2020, nearly 14M SF of new office space has been delivered, causing a sharp oversupply, as noted by Cushman & Wakefield.

New office construction has slowed significantly as the market works through that oversupply. The pipeline had only 756K SF expected to be fully delivered by the end of the third quarter, according to a separate CBRE report. 

Additionally, Austin is reported to have positive net absorption in Q1, with 110 tenants seeking 4.4M SF of space, CBRE stated. The metro’s improving office demand mirrors the broader national trend, which CBRE reported as the eighth straight quarter of positive demand.

Guerrero said the expected decline in the vacancy rate likely won’t be uniform across all office building classes, at least not in the near term. Trophy and Class-A assets will see rates decline before what he described as “older vintage buildings.”

“In the meantime, it remains a tenant-favorable market, presenting a window for occupiers to secure long-term leases before conditions tighten and pricing power begins to shift back toward landlords,” he said.

Gantry has secured a $16 million permanent loan to refinance the Kirkland Business Center located at 11860 NE 112th St in Kirkland, Washington.

Originally delivered in 1962 and 1969, the 104,000-square-foot, multi-tenant buildings are 100% leased to a range of small bay tenants. Gantry’s Principals Mike Wood and Mike Taylor, and Senior Associate Tim Brown, with the firm’s Seattle production office, represented the borrower, a private real estate investor. The seven-year, fixed-rate loan was provided by one of Gantry’s correspondent insurance company lenders and features cash-out proceeds with full-term interest-only payments. Gantry will service the loan on behalf of the lender.

“Well-located Puget Sound multi-tenant industrial continues to be a preferred allocation target for our network of insurance company lenders,” said Wood. “Their stable, fixed-rate permanent programs are attractive for legacy hold investors seeking to capitalize on long-term appreciation, historic performance, and strong operating metrics.”

A tightening industrial vacancy rate and a diminishing development pipeline have pushed Dallas-Fort Worth to the upper echelon of U.S. warehouse and logistics markets. 

Marcus & Millichap ranked DFW No. 3 on its new 2026 National Industrial Index as private investors have fueled metrowide transaction growth. Trading increased by around 40% year-over-year through the first quarter in DFW, thanks to a nearly 50% increase in transactions in the $1M to $10M range.

The national brokerage firm attributed that increase to DFW’s rising long-term investment demand due to the region’s robust employment growth, growing leasing momentum and diminishing supply. 

Courtesy of CapRock Partners

CapRock Partners broke ground on the 250K SF McKinney Air Business Park near the McKinney National Airport earlier this year.

“DFW is seen across the nation as a hub [for employment], with a diversified economy, massive population growth, good infrastructure,” Marcus & Millichap Senior Managing Director of Investments Adam Abushagur said of the factors that play into investors’ confidence in the metro. “We’ve been less affected by this cycle compared to a lot of other markets across the U.S, such as an LA, a New York and so on.”

Charlotte and Orlando, Florida, topped the industrial index, and the rest of the top 10 was filled out by Sun Belt and Midwest cities with a strong supply-demand balance, while Los Angeles and New York City were at Nos. 20 and 21, respectively. The declining development pipeline has tempered vacancy risks in DFW and many Sun Belt and Midwest markets, according to Marcus & Millichap’s 2026 Industrial Investment Midyear Outlook.

Marcus & Millichap projected DFW will add around 40,000 net new jobs in 2026. That employment growth, coupled with the region’s expanding population, is fueling just about all project types in the region, Abushagur said. 

For the industrial sector, employment and population growth mean more warehouse space is needed as more products need to be manufactured and delivered. Plus, more small businesses are occupying shallow-bay spaces, which is also contributing to the region’s tightening vacancy rate. 

DFW completions are projected to hit their lowest level since 2013, pushing the sector’s vacancy rate down to 8.9% in the first quarter. That’s the region’s lowest rate in three years.

Industrial demand has been strong in DFW for several years, but investors’ appetites have shifted away from the smaller infill assets that had been most popular, according to Trey McGhin, a principal at the land brokerage and investment firm Dosch Marshall Real Estate.

“Over the last 12 months, institutional equity has really returned for the industrial development market, and that, coupled with the tightening vacancy rates and supply being at a lower point, groups are now … really trying to pursue bigger product again,” McGhin said.

That has led to investors making deals in the higher-growth areas of the metro have more available land for development. Areas like Denton, South Dallas, Rockwall, Royce City, Terrell, Forney and Waxahachie are seeing renewed demand because of the desire to build 500K SF to 1M SF facilities, McGhin said.

McKinney has emerged as the hottest industrial market in DFW over the last year. Despite having one of the smallest industrial footprints in the region, it boasts some of DFW’s highest rents, thanks to tremendous growth around the expanding McKinney National Airport.

While McGhin expects demand to remain strong in the submarket, many of the best deals have already been done. 

“You’re starting to get to the point where a lot of those McKinney opportunities are more picked over,” McGhin said. “They still exist, but there’s definitely going to be more push to be on sort of the east side of the airport.”

Developers have also moved north of McKinney to the emerging city of Melissa for industrial opportunities, according to McGhin. 

The Fort Worth logistics corridor, northeast Dallas and the South Stemmons submarket are also expected to continue attracting investor attention this year, Marcus & Millichap reported. 

Abushagur attributed the increased investor confidence in DFW to the region’s status as a steady market on the national scene. McGhin said the return of institutional equity has also boosted investor confidence in getting deals capitalized. 

“When times are tough, it’s a lot easier to find $15M from a capital group than it is to go find $40M from a capital group,” McGhin said. “With the leasing being stronger, vacancy being tighter … and there just being more liquidity in the industrial capital markets, all of that is leading to more and larger deal activity.”

AV Management, a private New York based investment firm, completed the acquisition of 73-75 Sullivan St. in SoHo from a longtime SoHo developer for $43,333,000. Cushman & Wakefield’s Dylan Walsh and Nico Nicolaou represented the seller. Citizens Private Bank provided $21.6 million in competitive acquisition financing under significant time constraints.

73-75 Sullivan St. was completed in 2016 as a ground-up construction project. It features expansive layouts, modern construction vintage and long-term commercial tenancy, according to AV Management.

“This special situation transaction represents the robust opportunity set to purchase investment-grade assets at historically high yields by taking advantage of early-cycle market dynamics,” said AV Principal Ahcene Ouldsaada. “73-75 Sullivan St. capitalizes on the dislocation caused by the 2022’s historically unprecedented hike in domestic base rates. The asset was acquired at an opportunistic basis and will be held long-term as a permanent income vehicle with an option for attractive liquidity as markets normalize.”

REALM, in partnership with Delshah Capital and A.M. Properties, has acquired CitySpire, a 377,000-square-foot office condominium comprising 24 floors within the 70-story tower at 156 W 56th St. in Midtown Manhattan. Purchased at an 8.5% cap rate, the 98% occupied property features renovated common areas, high-end finishes and a roster of tenants including Caleres, Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP and New York Road Runners. 

Built in 1987 and maintained by institutional ownership, the property has undergone approximately $22 million in capital improvements and requires no near-term capital expenditures, REALM said, noting that. Manhattan office leasing activity reached pre-pandemic highs in late 2025. 

“CitySpire represents the type of opportunity we seek in today’s market,” said Travis King, founder and CEO of REALM, an investment collective of 130 family offices. “While capital markets remain cautious on office, we see strong fundamentals in premier Midtown assets, where leasing activity and occupancy continue to outperform. CitySpire reflects our focus on highly selective investments with strong downside protection and long-term upside.”